Privacy and Security Balance
Shakespeare's queen, Elizabeth I, lived under the threat of assassination from foreign powers. Religious disputes fueled the efforts along with the dash for colonies. She endured the attempted invasion by the Spanish Armada. In response, she employed secret police and a network of spies to protect her. The current NSA spying program would have suited her fine.
Our civilization needs both sharing and secrecy. When there is no privacy, new ideas, products, and companies do not form and economies stagnate. When organizations and groups can operate in total secrecy, some people use that secrecy to oppress others and to cause harm. In order to keep improving our lives, we need to find the balance between privacy and sharing.
Corporations may operate as if others are trying to assassinate them. Cyber-warfare is targeting corporations as much as or more than other governments. In today's world, often government spying is used to gather information for rivals. The estimate of what stolen information has cost U.S. companies runs into the $100+ billion.
The problem is that if a government can read our communications, so can a rival. We, too, need privacy in order to keep plans, discussions, and communications secure from those who want to use the information against us. For example, Bloomberg claims that companies are watching IP addresses from rival companies to see what kinds of Google searches people at the rival are doing. The current protocol for electronic mail is so insecure that it should not be used by anyone needing privacy let alone the Secretary of State.
In order to be secure, corporations need to have enough security to keep government agencies out of their communications.
On the individual level, there are a whole series of companies from Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Skype profiting from letting people share data online. A deep question has to be whether or not they should share those profits with those who are generating the data.
While there are many companies trying to replicate the success of the leaders in social media, there are several companies looking to upend the social media whole business model and put the control of the data back into the hands of the consumer. Companies such as Wickr and MobiSocial allow for posts to really disappear or never get past the few people that you want them to go to.
There are a number of places working to provide a radical level of privacy both to individuals and to corporations.
There are tools out there for secure email, instant messaging, and voice over IP communications. These tools can, with proper training and set up, provide secure communications between two parties. Communications with a group is far more difficult.
None of these tools are sufficient by themselves. A combination is required to get full privacy. It is proper that it is a lot of work to get privacy. In that way, only those who need it pay that price.